Friday, November 30, 2007
Don't Call Me Mohammed.
Once again I'm waiting for the outrage from Moderate Muslims. Hello? Is anyone out there?
If Christians called for murder every time someone blasphemed Jesus Christ, half our country (and very few liberals) would be left. If Christians, ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, stormed the streets calling for the murder of someone for blaspheming our Lord, every news media outlet would scour the streets looking for Christian outrage. AND THEY WOULDN'T HAVE TO LOOK FAR. We would denounce it immediately, in mass, and try to stop it.
Thankfully we actually are a religion of Peace.
UPDATE December 3, 2007: Ms. Gibbons has been pardoned and freed. Apparently some moderate Muslims did indeed speak out and reason prevailed.
Merry Christmas
Forget all the political correctness that plagues our society today. Forget all the different political and world views. Forget religion. Yes, that is what I said. Forget religion. Because it's not about having a religion, it's about having a belief, one in God and in Jesus, and walking that faith every day, even when it's hard. Even when life sucks. Because you know what? Your most terrible day here on Earth cannot in anyway compare to the worst day for Jesus. He died on a cross, perhaps one of the most painful and terrible ways to die. And he did it willingly (although not without agony and pleading for mercy) for us so that we could live forever, if only a blip of that time was here on Earth.
Remember the real meaning of Christmas. A Savior was born. Hope was established. Grace was given. All you need to do is just ask for it.
Our celebration of Christmas might 25 days away, but its never too early to remember the purpose behind our celebration and pray for His wisdom and grace to touch us all.
God Bless You & Merry Christmas.
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Former Rep. Henry Hyde, Rest in Peace
CNN/YouTube Debate: Ethics & Plants
This is an election for the President of the United States of America, and thus all Americans should be concerned with the answers and have an equal chance at asking questions. Equal, not greater than. If the questions came from the democratic candidates themselves it would not have been appropriate (but at least we could have assessed their motives), so why is it any different if they are from activists within their camps instead? All I'm asking is for a little disclosure. As a one-time member for the Society of Collegiate Journalists, I had to agree to uphold a code of ethics, the same one that the Society of Professional Journalists subscribes to. Apparently CNN is above all that. You don't have to get past the Preamble of their Code of Ethics to find a number of glaring problems:
... Identify sources whenever feasible. The public is entitled to as much information as possible on sources' reliability.
... Always question sources’ motives before promising anonymity. Clarify conditions attached to any promise made in exchange for information. Keep promises.
... Make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional material, photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites and quotations do not misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.
... Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting. Analysis and commentary should be labeled and not misrepresent fact or context.
And of course this one:
Examine their own cultural values and avoid imposing those values on others.
CNN? Yeah, right. Luckily we can do the last one for them.
First Impressions: CNN/YouTube Debate
Quick thoughts on each of the candidates and their performances:
Mike Huckabee gives the best sound bytes and always answers with a good cadence. It makes his responses more entertaining, but is there enough substance? His language reminds me a bit of Ross Perot. I like Governor Huckabee, but I wonder if there is a reason I haven't felt completely comfortable jumping in 100%. I keep finding myself uneasy that he is a committed conservative. Scholarships for illegal aliens? I understand Huckabee's principal on the matter... but every dollar spent on an illegal alien going to college is a dollar that could have been spent on a citizen instead. Until all citizens who want to go to college can, illegals should not get a penny of tax dollars.
Fred Thompson and John McCain seemed the most Presidential tonight. Their seriousness and candor seemed to rise above the rest of the candidates a bit and they both don't mind being detailed in their responses, even though the format and time constraints don't really allow it. Thompson stays high on my list and Senator McCain is on the rise.
Giuliani looked pretty good, but some of his responses came off a bit petty. His record in New York certainly gives him credible experience, but it still sounds funny talking about experience as a mayor preparing you for Washington, DC. It doesn't disqualify him and shouldn't be taken lightly... but there must be a substantial bureaucratic difference between the White House and City Hall. I know that, I hope he does.
Mitt Romney seemed like the slick preppie kid who was growing tired of being picked on. Romney doesn't perform overly poorly, but doesn't live up to expectations either.
Duncan Hunter never disappoints conservatives, when he actually gets a chance to answer a question. I like Duncan Hunter and hope he is given ample opportunity to be involved in the next administration.
Tom Tancredo had a better performance than previous debates. His issues haven't changed but he didn't stumble on them nearly as much. Still he is looked at, and even seems to understand himself, that he is a one issue candidate... as serious as illegal immigration is, we have other problems too.
And Ron Paul. Whatever. It was nice to hear him say he won't run as an independent... now I just hope he can get behind the party and help us keep the White House. Even more importantly, I hope he'll get behind the troops until the war is won.
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Anderson Cooper's Mea Culpa
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Oprah's Latest Favorite Thing.
In November 2003, Oprah had Dr. Jan Adams on her show talking about plastic surgery. Her implicit endorsement surely increased Dr. Adams' fame. Who knows if his association with Oprah led him to work on Kanye West's mom... but it did reportedly lead some other patients to seek him out. While other doctors turned Donda West down, Dr. Jan Adams agreed to perform her tummy tuck and breast reduction, cosmetic surgeries that led to her death. A background check on Dr. Jan Adams would have turned up a number of malpractice accusations, DUI charges, a restraining order, and his lack of board certification. But Oprah and her staff failed to do a background check on a man who benefited from her celebrity. Once again an endorsement from Oprah comes into question.
Now Oprah is on the campaign trail for Barack Obama. With a couple poor endorsements in her recent past, you have to wonder how much did Oprah investigate the candidate who she now is campaigning for? Did Oprah look into Barack's past and research his policy positions? Did Oprah consider other alternatives and research the person whose candidacy she has now endorsed? Or is her support of Barack Obama just like her support of James Frey and Dr. Jan Adams... misguided and ill-informed? Like the author and doctor before him, you have to wonder if Barack Obama will also turn out to be a fraud.
After these two glaring failures should Oprah's endorsement of anything, especially a person for high office, be taken seriously? If she can't bother to check into the background of a surgeon she holds in esteem or an author she helps make millions, you have to question how much she knows about the man she hopes will become President.
I for one am not blinded by her celebrity, and I hope no one else is any longer. If she doesn't take the time to research surgeons she promotes who have people's lives in their hands, then how much time has she spent understanding the problems that face average Americans and what Barack Obama will do to fix them? Oprah seems to be a great woman with a big heart, but celebrity does not make her a political advisor or expert. Quite the contrary, her celebrity might just be what blinds her to the truth and is why her latest "Favorite Thing" should not be anyone's other than her's.
If you want to support Barack Obama, fine. But don't take Oprah's word for it.
Do your own research because chances are, Oprah hasn't.
Time Shifted Debate Party
WHAT WAS I THINKING???
I wasn't. I didn't bother to look at the calendar or I would have known that the musical was Wednesday, November 28th, the same night as the Republican debate. It is my civic duty to watch the debate... how can I let some musical get in the way? Thanks to DVR and caffeine, I won't have to... I won't miss it, I'll just be late.
This musical better be good!
Sean Taylor
Family friend Richard Sharpstein said Taylor's father told him the news around 5:30 a.m.
"His father called and said he was with Christ and he cried and thanked me," said Sharpstein, Taylor's former lawyer. "It's a tremendously sad and unnecessary event. He was a wonderful, humble, talented young man, and had a huge life in front of him. Obviously God had other plans."
He said Taylor died early Tuesday at Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami, where he had been airlifted after the shooting early Monday.
Doctors had been encouraged late Monday when Taylor squeezed a nurse's hand, according to Vinny Cerrato, the Redskins' vice president of football operations. But Sharpstein said he was told Taylor never regained consciousness after being transported to the hospital and that he wasn't sure how he had squeezed the nurse's hand.
"Maybe he was trying to say goodbye or something," Sharpstein said.
Sean Taylor was 24. God Bless him, his family, and friends.
Monday, November 26, 2007
Hogan Knows Alimony.
I was about eight.
I quit watching wrestling a few years later. I told people it had gotten too fake... but it probably always had been and I just got too old to ignore it. In college I tuned in a time or two because RAW, WCW nitro & the nWo was all the rage. Hulk's trademark yellow shirt was now black and the Real American Hulk Hogan had replaced by Hollywood Hulk Hogan's darker "badguy" persona. Even though I knew it was all an act I still wanted to believe that my childhood hero was a good guy. I couldn't stand anything else. It wasn't fun anymore, my hero had fallen, and I quickly tuned it out.
Then a year or two ago Hulk Hogan again entered my conscience. On Hogan Knows Best you got to see Hulk and his seemingly well-adjusted two kids in their daily life. His relationship with his wife Linda seemed real... and it was possible to once again believe that sometimes good guys do make it in the wrestling business (and show business). Hulk sacrificed his body and time to help his children. And he sacrificed for his wife too... taking dance lessons and playing along with psychics or anything else Linda (or the producers) could throw at him.
Hulk was no longer my hero, but he had regained my respect. He told his kids that he loved them, and watched over his daughter like any other dad. He seemed to work hard at his marriage, and even fought a town council so they could keep their pets. He did everything he could so his children and wife could achieve their dreams... or so it seemed on reality tv.
But just like wrestling, apparently all isn't as it seems. Last week Hulk's wife Linda filed for divorce. And my one-time hero has fallen again.
Keep training, saying your prayers and eating your vitamins, Hulk. Its going to take a lot to write that alimony check.
Thursday, November 22, 2007
Thanksgiving from Fred Thompson
Amen.Twenty-five years ago this week, in his Thanksgiving Proclamation, Ronald Reagan wrote that America was set apart from other nations in an uncommon way.
He said that it was his belief that ‘a divine plan placed this great continent here between the oceans to be found by people from every corner of the Earth, who had a special love of faith and freedom.’
... [L]et us also pause to give special thanks and praise to the men and women of our Armed Forces and their families, stationed across the globe. If you are home today with your friends and family, take time to pray for those in uniform, whose sacrifice for our nation is as boundless as our love of the freedoms they fight to protect.
Thanks & Hope.
When things seem difficult its also easy to have a momentarily lapse and dwell on the negative. But it is at times like this that I quickly snap out of it. Life has proven to me time and time again that I will never be given more than I can handle, and it is always when things become too difficult that I find a blessed way through. Maybe there is a lesson here I haven't fully learned.
Every blessing is a gift, every trial an opportunity. So even though some aspects of life (like my career in the mortgage business) are difficult, I know it will be ok. As life throws a few curve balls, we have the opportunity to change and adapt like the orange fall leaves. For this I am truly thankful.
Thanks for me goes hand in hand with hope. And today, regardless of circumstance, I am full of thanks and hope. Thanks for all of the many blessing I have (an amazing wife, a nice home, a good family, health, a great country, and a God who loves me). I am also thankful for hope, because without hope, all of this wouldn't be possible, nor would what is to come.
Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. And we rejoice in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also rejoice in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint us, because God has poured out his love into our hearts by the Holy Spirit, whom he has given us. Romans 5:1-5
Today I hope you have many things to be thankful for. And if not, I hope you have hope. "Hope does not disappoint us" and for that we should all be thankful.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Three Badasses, One Candidate
If you haven't seen it yet, watch the Chuck Norris Approved Ad.
...and don't forget your t-shirt.
A Video Response: Huckabee & The Mortgage Industry
That was my question. Not sure how long the video response has been available, I just noticed it today. I like the video answer much better than the typed one on his blog where the Governor mentioned ending some stated loan programs. The governor is right in the video... the market will correct itself. I hope he has looked into this a little more carefully and understands now that the last thing we need is greater government intervention, on any side. I'm still a bit worried because he didn't say he opposed government restrictions on loan programs, but I am glad to hear his more detailed thoughts on the idea of personal responsibility for both the lender and the borrower.
YouTube Link.
Statistically, Huckabee catches Romney in Iowa
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
The Second.
Most will say that is an extreme example. I agree, it is extreme. I'll take a few rocket launchers and some semi-automatics instead.
The Second Amendment states:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Some people try to interpret that to mean that the people can ONLY keep arms if part of a well regulated militia. Some make up their own definition completely, and believe that the right to bear arms only applies to hunters (do you see anything about deer season in the Constitution?). As you can probably guess, I disagree.
A well regulated militia is not possible without the people bearing arms. It is clear to me, the NRA, Mike Huckabee, Fred Thompson, Ted Nugent and scores of other people that the intent of the Second Amendment was prohibit the United States government from taking away a citizen's right or ability to defend itself. And the threat is not just from wild animals or unfriendly redcoats... the threat citizens have the right to protect against is clearly the government itself.
And since the government can obtain any form of munition or weapon it sees fit, in order to protect from that very same government, any law-abiding citizen without a criminal record should be able to own and maintain any form of munition or weapon he or she can maintain. You can't limit me to a rifle or 12-gage when the government could show up at my door with Tomahawk Missiles.
The founders did everything in the power to limit the powers of the federal government. And while the individual state was supposed to be the standard bearer, the founders made every effort to give the most power and authority to the people themselves. After just breaking free of an overbearing government, the founders sought to protect future generations of Americans from having to do the same thing. In order to guarantee that, citizens were guaranteed the ability to speak freely, worship independently, and (among other things) to bear arms.
Look at what is happening around the world and its not hard to imagine why it is imperative that a citizen's right to protect itself is not denied. Whether through invasion or some political faction gaining traction, it is possible (no matter how improbable) that one day we could be faced with a systematic destruction of our rights in an America very different from our own. And if that day comes, I not only have the right but the duty to protect and defend my family and my community. The founders guaranteed it.
The problem with the militia argument is human nature. The farther you are from a threat the less amount of time it occupies your thoughts. With that in mind, prolonged peace time almost ensures a weak militia and a people who are ill-equipped to protect themselves. I think the founders had more foresight than that.
The other problem with the militia argument is it doesn't seem to correspond with the rest of the document. Where else in the Bill of Rights is a right enumerated only for a regulated subset of the population? Freedom of speech isn't protected only for the educated and the right to a speedy and public trial isn't only guaranteed to attorneys. So why would the right to bear arms only be guaranteed for a militia?
The Second Amendment protects the right to have a well regulated militia, the rights of citizens to participate in the militia, and the right of citizens to keep and maintain their own arms. I am baffled that there is any debate.
With the Supreme Court taking a case that might very well force a ruling on the Second Amendment, the debate on this very important right might finally be put to rest. I hope so.
Now if you'll excuse me, I think I'm going to take some hand gun lessons.
Shameless Plug: Second Amendment T-Shirts & Gifts.
Blogroll Addition.
An Inconvenient Truth About Iraq. I particularly liked the editorial the author linked to in an update: The Clinton-Obama-Bush Doctrine.
Thursday, November 15, 2007
RAIN.
Its nice when a politician understands they aren't at the top. And its nice, when expressions of faith are so quickly answered.
We are seeing a constant, heavy drumbeat of rain in the Raleigh area, as is much of the South. And Georgia... they got some rain too. It won't end the drought, but its a start, and we're all thankful for it.
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
The Invisible Men
Really? I find it hard to believe that someone who wants to be the Commander-in-Chief and the leader of the free world has no records from his tenure in office. Nothing about his accomplishments or legislative agendas for eight years? Maybe there were none.
John Edwards too is responding to calls for notes and records from his time in elected office. Try not to laugh. While I am surprised that there are no records from Obama's state senate career, I will be very surprised if there are any records from Edward's one term as a U.S Senator from the state of North Carolina. As a North Carolinian I can guarantee you there is nothing of prominence in that record. The only person Edwards helped during his one term in the Senate was himself. Oh, and a small collection of barbers and salon owners. It doesn't take many $400 haircuts to make a difference around here.
We're all just sexist and racist anyway.
If you haven't seen it happen yet... just open your eyes and wait.
And if you don't think it will affect the voters, then you don't know too many white males or guilt-driven liberals. This country is so full of apologists, political-correctness, and what some have called "white guilt". Its hard to quantify, but from college campuses, to pop culture, to church bake sales... listen long enough and you'll see it. People are so afraid of being labeled a racist or a sexist that they will go out of their way to prove the contrary. Ever heard the "but some of my best friends are black" defense?
If you think the Democrats aren't counting on people swaying their opinion towards the minority candidate because they don't want to appear to be a bigot... you are fooling yourself. In today's society, appearances really are all that often matters.
Just ask President Bush. When he put forth a solid plan to fix Social Security and privatize accounts for young Americans while leaving plans for upcoming retirees in place... the attack dogs were in full force. The truth didn't matter... people were intimidated and frightened. Bush was going to stop paying Seniors their retirement checks, and if you supported him you wanted to do the same. Of course none of it was true... but that didn't matter.
And look at the debate on illegal immigration. Has a single debate about this real issue regarding our sovereignty and security ever occurred where someone's legitimate opinion about enforcing our borders hasn't been diminished to racism?
There are analysts banking on the same politics of fear and over political correctness for the Presidential election, and it has already started. And even former President Bill Clinton is in on it. Last week, when speaking in Iowa, President Clinton talked about women in politics and the recent election of Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner and pondered “It’s hard to believe that America is more sexist than Argentina.”
On MSNBC last week, some "expert" was on Chris Matthews' show talking about the gender gap in the support of Hillary. According to her a much larger percentage of women than men support Hillary. Her conclusion, "obviously" sexism explains why she has fewer men supporters. Could there be another cause? Like maybe more women in the survey wanted to support another woman's advancement into a new area and overlooked Hillary's numerous flaws? Could it be that by our very nature men and woman are concerned about different issues and thus the gravitate to different candidates? I think its possible, but the "expert" surely didn't. To her, clearly it was gender discrimination.
And so it begins.
Why can't we choose someone based on their qualifications, experience, values, opinion and character? Until we're all colorblind I guess its inevitable. But its not because of his color that I don't like Barack Obama, and its certainly not because of Hillary's gender. If you want to believe otherwise, so be it. Dismiss me. Dismiss us. All of us conservatives are just sexist, racists anyway.
But remember, I don't like Al Gore either, and he's about as white as they come.
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Saying Goodbye.
He was the most loving and gentle soul you could ever meet.
I remember having a party at the house when Maxwell was eleven or twelve. Already old for his breed, and completely blind, Max walked around and greeted everyone who came. When a friend's toddler decided to pull on the hair of this back and walk him around like a show pony, Max happily obliged, even though I know he didn't care for it. When the same boy tried to get on him and take a ride, Max stood firm and kept quiet, seeming to know it was a child who didn't know better and needed special care. He never snapped, never was mean... even up until the end. Many old dogs withdraw and want to be left alone when they get old and weary... but not Maxwell. All he wanted to be close to you. All he needed was a gentle stroking of his coat or a few kind words "good boy Maxwell, that's my buddy."
It was tough losing him, but it was time to say goodbye. When it wasn't hard, but impossible for him to get up, when he began wincing in pain and no longer seemed interested in food or oatmeal cream pies... we knew his time was up.
That was last month.
Yesterday, my wife's childhood cat was also let go. It was Sonny's time. For 17 years everyone loved the “Kitty” and he loved everyone in return. He greeted my wife and her brother everyday after school and lovingly purred in their arms when they returned home from college or adult life. He didn't change much over the years; he was the same orange tabby who was always around the house. And while his movement got a little slower and his body a bit thinner, Sonny was remarkably similar in mind and spirit as he reportedly always had been... up until last week.
Last week Sonny had a stroke and everything changed. Unlike Maxwell who aged over time, Sonny's life changed rather sudden. The always self-sufficient friendly kitty grew old in an instant.
I wonder if he knew Will was about to graduate from Grad School, and Melanie was off married now. I wonder if he knew Peggy needed to spend time taking care of Tim during his recovery.
I wonder is he knew his job was done, and he wanted to let go when Will and Melanie were not around so they could always remember him in the same happy state.
After 17 years of greeting the kids home from school and being the talk around Christmas, it was Sonny's time to move on. It must be hard watching the kids grow up and move out... even for a cat.
As much as I hate that we have had to say goodbye to two pets who have shown unconditional love, I am thankful in how it happened. I find it remarkably divine that my wife got to know and love Max and saw how hard it was at the end. I believe in some small way that process and being there for me helped her to better cope and understand being there for Sonny. What otherwise would have been foreign to Melanie became a matter of fact, and while she still shed her tears and hurt over Sonny's loss, she was strong and confident knowing that the decisions were right.
God uses everything for good, even loss.
But it’s still hard to say goodbye.
Saturday, November 10, 2007
Big Phoney
After watching the Clintons for years, its hard not to read into everything. Since before 1992, long before I was really interested in politics, I have had a distrust of Bill and Hillary. Even the most mundane questions posed to them get legalese answers that are left up to interpretation. I'd be surprised if there are more than five occurrences in Bill Clinton's entire presidency where he ever said "Yes" or "No" to anything. Everything with the Clintons is grey. Even the definition of "is". And if you do manage to get them to answer something definitively, and it turns out to not be politically advantageous or suit them at a later date... they'll start more Clinton-speak to talk their way out of it. And if that doesn't work, then they'll just lie.
The populous now knows this about the Clintons. And the Clintons know we know. If only they could control the specific questions asked of them, then they could control the tone and message while limiting the amount of double-talk and non-answers.
And that is exactly what they are doing.
That's what they did recently in Iowa, when the Clinton campaign planted student questions ahead of a public appearance. Why worry about preparing for any number of possible questions you could be asked, if you can just control what will be asked ahead of time? Then maybe your canned response, in response to your canned question, can actually sound like a real answer and not some ethereal doublespeak.
But of course I'm a member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. And I tip my waitresses too.
Thursday, November 8, 2007
Always Tip, Always Deliver
[thought: I wonder if this NPR story would have a different tone if covering republicans?]
Andrew Cuomo is a traitor.
I've said it before and been accused of yelling it in the office. Now is not the time to try and achieve political gains, especially when you don't know what you are talking about. Any politician who uses the current crisis in the mortgage industry as a way to make a name for themselves or play political leapfrog over rivals is evil. There are good people facing serious hurdles paying their bills. There are hard working Americans, who have never missed a payment, suddenly facing lates on their credit report and the potential for foreclosure. There are countless workers in the mortgage, construction, and real estate industries facing smaller paychecks or unemployment. And these things spread.
Now is not the time to "pile on".
New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is coming out with both barrels against Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Washington Mutual, and the mortgage industry in general. And he's doing it with press releases and political maneuvering. You think there was a "credit crunch" going on now? Wait until Fannie, Freddie, WAMU, or some other large national outfit just decides to stop lending. That's what has already happened in the subprime market and with some smaller prime players. Just wait until the big boys in the conforming market follow suit. And you think getting a loan was hard now and foreclosures were bad.... if this kind of thing continues, you haven't seen anything yet.
The always animated Jim Cramer is right to use his platform to go after Cuomo. I saw him do it on tv last night, and he's continuing the drumbeat today. Cramer calls him a communist... I think he's even worse than that.
Politicians in Washington and around the country are coming up with new laws and regulations that will supposedly fix the mortgage industry. They are eliminating variable products, yield spread, stated loans, and other alternatives that helps consumers and their advisors structure a deal to make the purchase of a home a viable option. When the options left aren't attractive or feasible for the consumers out there who are trying to get out of a rental or trying to keep a home... they will have no where to go. Consumer confidence will continue to go down. Ownership rates will continue to go down. Credit scores will continue to go down. Other industries will be affected as people can't afford what they once could, or can't make minimum payments for what they now have. Prices and values will continue to fall. The only things that will increase will be the foreclosure rate and unemployment.
This is serious business, and a serious problem facing our country. While many in the media and elsewhere would rather discuss Rosie O'Donnell's job prospects or whether or not J-Lo is pregnant... our country is on the brink of a recession. And anyone who uses the backs of hardworking Americans facing tough times as a way to catapult into greater political capital is a traitor. Our country and its people come first. Don't sacrifice them and us... don't make the situation worse just because you think your political prospects will become better.
You want to make the situation better? Leave it alone. How many times can I say it... Lender's don't want to foreclose on a home. It is a zero-sum game at best. Changes need to be made, but they need to be made by the people who understand how this works... Washington, North Carolina and other state legislatures, and politicians around the country have proven they don't. The market can't work this out with the threat of lawsuits, increased regulation, and political posturing. The threat of bad debt is bad enough.
Keep meddling around and everyone will take their ball and go home... where do you think that will leave homeowners or the economy?
Thoughts on the Top 5
Every time I lean towards Fred Thompson, I come up wanting more. I really, really like Thompson's message and thoughtfulness. We need someone who thinks and isn't just offering humorous quips or vicious one-liners. We need to get away from this entitlement society and strong, overbearing government. Our national government should protect our lives and liberty, but do little else. As much as Fred fits that bill, media reports keep pushing the thought the people are less than inspired after hearing Senator Thompson speak. Fred is right in all that he says... this is a crucial point in our history. In order to overcome this desperate hour, we need someone who is going to inspire us to continued greatness. That is where I fear Thompson falls short.
The obvious choice to fill the inspiration void should be Governor Huckabee. Every time I hear Huckabee I become a little more invigorated and energized. I like how the Governor explains most things and we agree on quite a bit. But every once in a while there is a glimpse of a man who might be disconnected from conservatism. Increased government regulation that prohibits customer choice of mortgage products is not conservative. And let's not even discuss the Governor's somewhat mythical ideas on illegal immigration... he doesn't seem to walk a fine line, but rather jump from one side to the other. That's fine... these are tough issues that require thought and deliberation... but they are also very important issues and I need to know we have some agreement, at least in principal. I think I know where Governor Huckabee is coming from when we disagree.
For me, after these two, there is everyone else. Giulini, McCain, Romney.
I was surprised to see Pat Robertson endorse Giuliani yesterday. I like the Mayor... but on social issues, gun rights, immigration, and so much else... we just don't see eye to eye, and that sentiment is certainly shared by many Conservatives and Christians alike. But does a Pat Robertson endorsement in 2007 really mean that much? Like the late Reverend Falwell, Pat Robertson isn't always treated fairly or honestly by the mainstream media, nor is he the Protestant version of the Pope as some leftists would have you believe. And just because Robertson picks the Mayor doesn't mean all of the other candidates' religious support will fade away. But if security and a nation in crisis is really the focus of the electorate, I wonder if Rudy isn't an appropriate choice?
John McCain is a hero. John McCain is a patriot. John McCain is someone who I would love to see as Vice President or more appropriately Secretary of Defense or State. But as much as I respect him, I don't want him to be President. He has certainly had his trouble with Conservatives and Christians in the past, and still seems to think Conservative Christians are just some far-right group whose support he begrudgingly needs comparable to MoveOn.org for the left. As far as I'm concerned, that's only a few steps away from Rosie O'Donnell comparing Christians to terrorists... and its miles away from the truth. Yes you need the Conservative Christian support to wage a successful Republican bid for the Presidency... but these are the same voices who this country was founded on... I don't think having their support is a necessary evil... its an honor.
Then there's Romney. I was absolutely enraged when the man who campaigned in Massachusetts by distancing himself from Republicans and Reagan decided to invoke his name and legacy so many times during last month's debate. While far from John Kerry, the Bush 2004 campaign showed how to successfully run against a flip-flopper... do we really need to hand the Democrats the winning strategy in 2008?